A selection of recent media reports

Fence to deter immigrants
Work will start next month on a six-mile fence topped with razor wire on Greece's border with Turkey to deter illegal im...
The Independent (07-Feb-2012)
Britain must become a land of opportunity once more to attract the world's workers
COUNTRIES receive the immigrants they deserve. A migrant has 192 countries to
City A.M. (07-Feb-2012)
Bin Laden's former right-hand man in Europe released on bail
Radical cleric Abu Qatada to be confined to his home for 22 hours a day as he fights deportation
The Independent (07-Feb-2012)
Qatada back on the streets within days
Abu Qatada, the radical Islamic preacher once described as Osama bin Laden's \u201Cright hand man in Europe\u201D, will ...
Telegraph.co.uk (06-Feb-2012)
Abu Qatada release: Home Office fury as judge frees 'Bin Laden aide'
Radical Islamist cleric will walk free from Long Lartin maximum security prison afte
Guardian.co.uk (06-Feb-2012)
Why has Abu Qatada not stood trial in the UK?
Lawyers say the government was determined to pursue deportation, which was thought to be the easy option
Guardian.co.uk (06-Feb-2012)
Greece to build £2.5million six-mile razor wire wall to block worst illegal immigration route into Europe
The busiest crossing point for illegal immigrant
Mail Online (06-Feb-2012)
Radical cleric Qatada granted bail
A radical Muslim cleric accused of posing a grave threat to Britain's national security will be released on bail within ...
London Evening Standard (06-Feb-2012)
Greece starts building border fence with Turkey
\u2014 filed under: Greece, immigration (ATHENS) - Greece on Monday started building a fence on its border with Turkey
EUbusiness.com (06-Feb-2012)
Latvian man wanted for gunpoint rape deported after being found living in Gainsborough
A Latvian man wanted for raping a teenager at gunpoint in his home countr
This is Lincolnshire (06-Feb-2012)
Abu Qatada in court seeking bail
London hearing to decide whether radical cleric should be freed after extradition to Jordan was blocked by Europe court
Guardian.co.uk (06-Feb-2012)
FURY AS WAR CRIMES SUSPECT IS ALLOWED TO STAY IN BRITAIN
CAMPAIGNERS have condemned a legal ruling that a war crimes suspect should stay in Britain because he has
Express.co.uk (06-Feb-2012)
England 'border controls' fear
Published on 6 February 2012
Herald Scotland (06-Feb-2012)
How Britain's migrants sewed the fabric of the nation
History shows it's hard to pick out which migrants will be good for the UK. It is risky for the state to try
Guardian.co.uk (05-Feb-2012)
BOMB PLOTTERS ARE MY STUDENTS, ADMITS CHOUDARY
HARDLINE Islamist preacher Anjem Choudary taught six of the nine fanatics jailed last week for plotting to bomb Londo
Daily Star (05-Feb-2012)
Man accused of involvment in war crimes wins human rights claim
A man accused of being complicit in war crimes in the former Yugoslavia has been allowed to stay in Brit
Telegraph.co.uk (05-Feb-2012)
TIME FOR SOFT-TOUCH BRITAIN TO GET TOUGH ON IMMIGRATION
BRITAIN has a proud and honourable history when it comes to immigration.
Scottish Daily Express (05-Feb-2012)
Ten jailed over sham marriage plot
Ten people have been jailed for attempting to organise an international sham marriage conspiracy spanning three churches...
Hucknall Dispatch (05-Feb-2012)
Ten jailed over sham marriage plot
Ten people have been jailed for attempting to organise an international sham marriage conspiracy spanning three churches...
Sleaford Standard (05-Feb-2012)

Policy, Amnesty & Voting 11.19

Family Visitor Appeals

Summary

1. The number of family visitor appeals has increased eight fold, to over a thousand a week, since charges were abolished in 2002. The cost has reached approximately £1 million a week. The definition of family visitor is so wide that it could include as many as 120 relatives of a middle aged person in Britain. The definition should be tightened, charges re-imposed and bonds should be made an option (paragraph 11).

Introduction

2. The Immigration Appeals Act 1969 and the Immigration Act 1971 granted Rights of Appeal against a wide range of immigration decisions, including refusals to grant entry clearance. However, the Asylum and Immigration Appeals Act 1993 removed appeal rights for rejected visitors and short term students.

3. In October 2000, following disquiet, particularly in the Asian and Black communities, that family members were being refused visit visas without appropriate remedy, the Right of Appeal against refusal of visitors visas for "family visitors" was re-instated under the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999. Fees were originally set at £500 for an oral hearing or £150 for an appeal without a hearing. In January 2001 these fees were reduced to £125 and £50 but in May 2002 the fees were abolished entirely.

Definition of a family visitor

4. For these purposes a family visitor is defined in Section 90 (1) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 as any of the following persons:

(a) the applicant's spouse, father, mother, son, daughter, grandfather, grandmother, grandson, granddaughter, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, nephew, niece or first cousin. In these Regulations "first cousin" means, in relation to a person, the son or daughter of his uncle or aunt;09.

(b) the father, mother, brother or sister of the applicant's spouse;

(c) the spouse of the applicants son or daughter;

(d) the applicants stepfather, stepmother, stepson, stepdaughter, stepbrother or stepsister; or

(e) a person with whom the applicant has lived as a member of an unmarried couple for at least two of the three years before the day on which his application for entry clearance was made.

5. This definition of family visitor is so widely drawn that somebody from a third world country where the number of children per family is often four or five, could sponsor somewhere between 80 and 120 people under this scheme (Annex A). Furthermore, the provision for unmarried couples is particularly hard to verify and is therefore open to abuse.

6. A "family visitor" can generally appeal against refusal even if the applicant intends to do something else also during the trip. The legislation does not specify that visiting a family member has to be the sole, main or primary purpose of the trip. Nor does the sponsor have to be settled in the UK so someone still seeking asylum can sponsor a “family visitor”.

7. The number of family visitor appeals has increased eight fold, to over a thousand a week, since fees were abandoned as the following table shows [1] [2] :

2000200120022003/42004/52005/62006/72007/8
1374,3667,99716,88430,64358,49550,06564,669

8. Of particular concern is the rapid growth of applications from certain countries. In 2006 India, Pakistan and Nigeria produced over ¼ million applications - up by a factor of 16 over a period of four years. 175,000 were approved. In 2008 applications from these three countries totalled 197,000 of which 134,000 were approved.[3] The worldwide total in 2008 was 414,000 of which 312,000 were approved.[4]

a) the definition of "family" is extremely wide, such as to include 50 - 120 relatives each.

b) The government’s failure to remove those who stay beyond their visas must by now be well known.

c) It must also be widely known to relatives overseas that embarkation controls are due to be introduced in a few years time.

d) Talk of an amnesty for illegals can only encourage people to take a chance.

e) Those who are refused can appeal at the British tax payers expense.

Cost

10. The average unit cost of an Asylum and Immigration Tribunal Appeal in the financial year 2005/6 from receipt to final decision was £762. This figure represents the average unit cost of administration for all types of appeal before the tribunal and includes judicial costs, accommodation and the cost of providing an interpreter at the appeal hearing where this is necessary [5] . On this basis the cost of family visitor appeals in 2007/8 was £50 million. Even this is lower than an estimate of £60 million reported to be that of the Minister of Immigration.[6]

Proposed Changes

11. Given that there is no recording of visitors as they arrive and depart, there is no way of knowing whether those originally admitted as "family visitors" have left the UK, we propose that:

(a) The definition of “family visitor” should be substantially tightened, at least until embarkation controls are in place. In particular, uncles, aunts, nephews, nieces and first cousins should no longer be included. This would reduce the number of eligible relatives by up to 68.

(b) Fees should be re-instated at the original levels. There is no reason why the British tax payer should pay the costs of appeals by foreign visitors.

(c) The right to sponsor family visitors should be confined to British citizens. The relatives of others should apply as ordinary visitors.

(d) There should be provision for sponsors to deposit a bond in cases of doubt. The bond would be repaid as soon as the visitor reported back to the issuing Consulate.

2 January, 2010

Notes

  1. Parliamentary Answer 5 July 2006 Col 333 –4 W and Parliamentary Answer 84607 12 July 2006
  2. Hansard 23 March 2009 Col 175 W
  3. Parliamentary Answer 20 July 2009 Col 920 W
  4. Hansard 26 March 2009 Col 649 W
  5. House of Commons reply to Mr Pelling [91629]
  6. Sunday Observer 3 Feb 2008 , Nicholas Watt’s interview with Liam Byrne.
Annex A

Based on an average family sizes of 4 and 5 children per family a person resident in the UK could have up to 81 and 120 eligible family members in their country of origin, made up as follows:

Based on 4 childrenBased on 5 childrenNotes
Parents22
Grandparents44
Uncles/Aunts68Each parent has 3 or 4 siblings
First cousins24404/5 children for each uncle/aunt
Brothers/sisters34
Nieces/Nephews12204/5 children of each brother/sister
Children45
Children's spouses45
Grandchildren1625
Spouse11
Spouse's brother/sister34
Spouse's parents22
Total81120